A completely new video recording may be removed from YouTube if it contains clips from a music track belonging to a rightsholder who objects to the use. By avoiding direct copying of a sound or video recording, parodists can avoid having their work removed from services like YouTube, even though the indirectly copied elements such as musical notes of a composition may still be infringing. Another thing that UK courts will consider when evaluating whether an unlicensed parody is infringing is the potential for economic harm to the original rightsholder as a result of the new parody.
A critical art project, hanging in a university gallery, is unlikely to compete economically with the target of the parody in the commercial marketplace. If the parody is to be used in any commercial fashion, it is strongly advised to seek the permission of the rightsholder for use of the underlying work. There is broad recognition in the UK and other countries that the free speech aspects of critical parody must be encouraged and enabled, while at the same time respecting the rights of copyright owners.
Indeed, the European Court of Justice has expressly acknowledged that the use of work protected by copyright for the purposes of parody is justified by the right to freedom of expression see Legal Language below.
There are two exceptions to be aware of, one specifically for criticism and review and a more general exception for quotation. Both exceptions apply to all types of copyright material….
Copyright Bite 3 considers how you can lawfully make use of, or borrow from, works that are still in copyright, but without having to ask for permission or make payment to the copyright owner. There are four broad principles to consider with respect to copyright and parody: 1. Permission should be sought when possible A parody will not infringe copyright if the parodist has secured the permission of the rightsholder. Consider the substance of work copied In considering whether an unlicensed parody has infringed the copyright of the creator, courts in the UK will consider the importance substantiality of the copied portions of the work for the original piece as a whole.
Commercial harm Another thing that UK courts will consider when evaluating whether an unlicensed parody is infringing is the potential for economic harm to the original rightsholder as a result of the new parody.
The importance of freedom of expression There is broad recognition in the UK and other countries that the free speech aspects of critical parody must be encouraged and enabled, while at the same time respecting the rights of copyright owners. Creators Discuss. Visual Artist. Public Domain. Public Domain: Duration. Copyright Bites. Copyright in SMEs. Lawful Reuse. Yes, assuming you have made a parody, then you are the author of the work and your authorship extends only to your original creation.
Any rights in the underlying work would remain with the original author. Skip to content Technology. Note the above information does not consider the law of another jurisdiction, such as the United States, where many films and iconic pop culture products originate.
Small Business The legality of selling parody products. Small Business Intellectual property. LawAdvisor helps everyone understand, protect and enforce their legal rights by connecting people with lawyers and their trusted advice.
Articles you may also like.
0コメント